cc_logo
Organic Field Crop Research

An Evaluation Of New Organic Soybean Weed Control Systems For Michigan Farmers

objectives

  • Compare yields on rowed soybeans vs. drilled soybeans.
  • Compare yields on drilled soybeans at three populations.
  • Compare yields on soybeans with winter rye interseeded into drilled and rowed soybeans.
  • Compare weed control between treatments with winter rye and without winter rye.

Field and planting records

  • Organic status: Forth year chemical free
  • Soil type: Kalamazoo Sandy Loam
  • Previous crop: Corn
  • Planting date: June 7, 2000 (Rye and Soybeans)
  • Harvest date: October 12, 2000
  • Plot size: 10' X 100'
  • Experimental design: Randomized Complete Block, five replications
  • Rye variety: Wheeler
  • Soybean variety: NK 19-90
  • Rotary hoed: June 16, June 19, June 28
  • Cultivated: July 18

Treatments

Trt # Row Width (inches) Soybeans Seeds/A Rye bu/A
1 7.5 180,000 2
2 7.5 360,000 2
3 7.5 540,000 2
4 7.5 180,000 -
5 7.5 360,000 -
6 7.5 540,000 -
7 30 180,000 2
8 30 180,000 -

Results (Plants per acre, taken late July)

Treatment Soybeans Rye Weeds
180k soy, drilled, 2 bu rye 131,225 186,764 3,812
360k soy, drilled, 2 bu rye 206,910 219,978 1,634
540k soy, drilled, 2 bu rye 284,229 209,633 0
180k soy, drilled, no rye 102,366 - 9,801
360k soy, drilled, no rye 206,366 - 10,890
540k soy, drilled, no rye 288,585 - 9,801
180k soy, rowed, 2 bu rye 105,600 250,470 13,939
180k soy, rowed, no rye 127,900 - 871

Pounds per acre plant biomass, taken mid August.

Treatment Soybeans Rye Weeds
180k soy, drilled, 2 bu rye 3793.2 315.7 30.7
360k soy, drilled, 2 bu rye 4319.5 250.3 18.3
540k soy, drilled, 2 bu rye 4477.0 159.4 2.5
180k soy, drilled, no rye 3702.8 0.0 215.0
360k soy, drilled, no rye 5025.7 0.0 14.5
540k soy, drilled, no rye 4594.9 0.0 5.1
180k soy, rowed, 2 bu rye 2199.2 906.3 24.7
180k soy, rowed, no rye 4043.2 0.0 10.4

Soybean yield, bushels per acre.

Treatment Yield
180k soy, drilled, 2 bu rye 35.7 c
360k soy, drilled, 2 bu rye 41.4 b
540k soy, drilled, 2 bu rye 42.0 b
180k soy, drilled, no rye 34.7 c
360k soy, drilled, no rye 40.1 b
540k soy, drilled, no rye 41.9 b
180k soy, rowed, 2 bu rye 36.7 c
180k soy, rowed, no rye 47.1 a
LSD @ (0.05) 3.3

Observations

  • Rowed soybeans yield was adversely affected by interseeding rye with no cultivation.
  • Drilled soybean yield was not affected by interseeding rye.
  • Drilled soybean yield increased when planting population was doubled from common planting rate.
  • Drilled soybean yield did not increase when planting populations increased from double rate to triple rate.
  • Weed counts and weed biomass were lower in treatments with interseeded rye, though soybean yield was not affected.
  • The spring seeded winter annual rye grew well early in the season, but by August it began to die.
  • Sandy soils at KBS allow for timely tillage after rainfall.

This study was replicated on three other Michigan farms.

©2009 Michigan State University Board of Trustees.
MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer. East Lansing, MI. 48824

logo Michigan State University